Dr. Win Dunwell posted links to several sessions presented at the
Kentucky Landscape Industries 2012 Winter Conference
Visit his website at
http://www.ca.uky.edu/HLA/Dunwell/KLI2012.html
Bob
Hill_- Fun and Whimsy in the Landscape
Carey
Grable_- Product Trial RootTrapper®-In-Pot Insert
Elizabeth
Peters - Oregon Nurseries are harnessing the POWER of LEAN
Jim
Wallitsch - Lean Flow_at Wallitsch Nursery and Garden Center
Lori
May - Raker Trial Gardens 2011 Top Landscape Items
Margie
Hunter - WildlifeNativesHandout_KLI_2012.pdf
Mark
Czarnota - Herbicides for the Nursery and Landscape Industry
Mark
Czarnota - Some Troublesome Weeds of Ornamentals
Nicole
Ward - Spring Landscape Disease Management
Rebecca
Schnelle - PGRs: New Products and Uses
Sarah
Vanek - What's happening in the pest community? Using an Events Calendar To
Focus Insect Scouting Efforts
Nicole Ward Gauthier, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service.
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Friday, February 3, 2012
Why Topping Hurts Trees
Why Topping Hurts Trees from www.treesaregood.com
Topping is perhaps the most harmful tree pruning practice known. Yet, despite more than 25 years of literature and seminars explaining its harmful effects, topping remains a common practice.
What is Topping?Topping is the indiscriminate cutting of tree branches to stubs or to lateral branches that are not large enough to assume the terminal role. Other names for topping include "heading," "tipping," "hat-racking," and "rounding over."
Topping is often used to reduce the size of a tree. A homeowner may feel that a tree has become too large for his or her property, or that tall trees may pose an unacceptable risk. Topping, however, is not a viable method of height reduction and certainly does not reduce future risk. In fact, topping will increase risk in the long term.
Topping Stresses Trees
Topping can remove 50 to 100 percent of a tree’s leaf-bearing crown. Leaves are the food factories of a tree. Removing them can temporarily starve a tree and trigger various survival mechanisms. Dormant buds are activated, forcing the rapid growth of multiple shoots below each cut. The tree needs to put out a new crop of leaves as soon as possible. If a tree does not have the stored energy reserves to do so, it will be seriously weakened and may die.
A stressed tree with large, open pruning wounds is more vulnerable to insect and disease infestations. The tree may lack sufficient energy to chemically defend the wounds against invasion, and some insects are actually attracted to the chemical signals trees release.
Topping Leads to Decay
Correct pruning cuts are made just beyond the branch collar at the point of attachment. The tree is biologically equipped to close such a wound, provided the tree is healthy enough and the wound is not too large. Cuts made along a limb between lateral branches create stubs with wounds that the tree may not be able to close. The exposed wood tissues begin to decay. Normally, a tree will "wall off," or compartmentalize, the decaying tissues, but few trees can defend the multiple severe wounds caused by topping. The decay organisms are given a free path to move down through the branches.
Topping Can Lead to Sunburn
Branches within a tree’s crown produce thousands of leaves to absorb sunlight. When the leaves are removed, the remaining branches and trunk are suddenly exposed to high levels of light and heat. The result may be sunburn of the tissues beneath the bark, which can lead to cankers, bark splitting, and death of some branches.
Topping Can Lead to Unacceptable Risk
The survival mechanism that causes a tree to produce multiple shoots below each topping cut comes at great expense to the tree. These shoots develop from buds near the surface of the old branches. Unlike normal branches that develop in a socket of overlapping wood tissues, these new shoots are anchored only in the outermost layers of the parent branches and are weakly attached.
The new shoots grow quickly, as much as 20 feet (6 m)in one year in some species. Unfortunately, the shoots are prone to breaking, especially during windy or icy conditions. While the original goal was to reduce risk by reducing height, risk of limb failure has now increased.
Topping is perhaps the most harmful tree pruning practice known. Yet, despite more than 25 years of literature and seminars explaining its harmful effects, topping remains a common practice.
What is Topping?Topping is the indiscriminate cutting of tree branches to stubs or to lateral branches that are not large enough to assume the terminal role. Other names for topping include "heading," "tipping," "hat-racking," and "rounding over."
Topping is often used to reduce the size of a tree. A homeowner may feel that a tree has become too large for his or her property, or that tall trees may pose an unacceptable risk. Topping, however, is not a viable method of height reduction and certainly does not reduce future risk. In fact, topping will increase risk in the long term.
Topping Stresses Trees
Topping can remove 50 to 100 percent of a tree’s leaf-bearing crown. Leaves are the food factories of a tree. Removing them can temporarily starve a tree and trigger various survival mechanisms. Dormant buds are activated, forcing the rapid growth of multiple shoots below each cut. The tree needs to put out a new crop of leaves as soon as possible. If a tree does not have the stored energy reserves to do so, it will be seriously weakened and may die.
A stressed tree with large, open pruning wounds is more vulnerable to insect and disease infestations. The tree may lack sufficient energy to chemically defend the wounds against invasion, and some insects are actually attracted to the chemical signals trees release.
Topping Leads to Decay
Correct pruning cuts are made just beyond the branch collar at the point of attachment. The tree is biologically equipped to close such a wound, provided the tree is healthy enough and the wound is not too large. Cuts made along a limb between lateral branches create stubs with wounds that the tree may not be able to close. The exposed wood tissues begin to decay. Normally, a tree will "wall off," or compartmentalize, the decaying tissues, but few trees can defend the multiple severe wounds caused by topping. The decay organisms are given a free path to move down through the branches.
Topping Can Lead to Sunburn
Branches within a tree’s crown produce thousands of leaves to absorb sunlight. When the leaves are removed, the remaining branches and trunk are suddenly exposed to high levels of light and heat. The result may be sunburn of the tissues beneath the bark, which can lead to cankers, bark splitting, and death of some branches.
Topping Can Lead to Unacceptable Risk
The survival mechanism that causes a tree to produce multiple shoots below each topping cut comes at great expense to the tree. These shoots develop from buds near the surface of the old branches. Unlike normal branches that develop in a socket of overlapping wood tissues, these new shoots are anchored only in the outermost layers of the parent branches and are weakly attached.
The new shoots grow quickly, as much as 20 feet (6 m)in one year in some species. Unfortunately, the shoots are prone to breaking, especially during windy or icy conditions. While the original goal was to reduce risk by reducing height, risk of limb failure has now increased.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Lean Makes Green Workshop
Lean Makes Green Workshop for nursery owners and managers
Feb 29 Lyndon, KY, $25 per person
Reduce operating costs, improve quality, free-up time, better manage inventory.
Contact Sarah Vanek sarah.vanek@uky.edu or 859-257-1273
Feb 29 Lyndon, KY, $25 per person
Reduce operating costs, improve quality, free-up time, better manage inventory.
Contact Sarah Vanek sarah.vanek@uky.edu or 859-257-1273
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Fungicide Resistance Found in Strawberry
Strawberry gray mold resistance to fungicides appears widespread
The fungal organism that causes gray mold in strawberries has become completely resistant to some fungicides that Southeastern growers have been relying upon for years.
Should spring weather be cool and wet, strawberry producers may experience the "perfect storm."
With that in mind, Guido Schnabel, a research and Extension plant pathologist at Clemson University, says growers should carefully choose and rotate fungicides.
His research group collected samples from
The fungicide classes with the greatest levels of resistance were QoIs, SDHIs and benzimidazoles, he says.
But the resistance wasn't uniform, Schnabel says.
"In some areas, benzimidazoles are still active, while in other areas SDHIs are still active," he says.
What has him more concerned is how widespread the resistance is.
"We didn't expect to see that much resistance so widespread," he says.
The resistance is caused by mutation at the fungicidal target site in the fungi.
"The fitness of the resistant isolates compares to the sensitive isolates," Schnabel says. "Even though you back off with one chemical, there's a good chance that the resistant ones will outcompete the sensitive ones."
As a result, it may take several years of not using a fungicide before the fungal organism regains sensitivity to the product.
The fungus, Botrytis cinerea, causes crown rot, tissue blight and fruit rot.
During wet, cool weather, untreated plants can lose up to 90 percent of flowers and fruit.
Growers may be unaware of the resistance problem because they have not experienced total product failure, he says.
In addition, recent dry weather has minimized fungal pressures.
Growers may be spraying regularly, but the dry weather—and not the fungicide—is keeping gray mold in check, Schnbabel says.
To help growers determine whether they have resistant gray mold isolates in their fields and to which chemical or chemicals, Schnabel is part of a team developing field test kits.
These are similar to test kits he helped develop for Southeastern peach growers who had resistant fruit rot isolates in their orchards.
The idea is growers test the gray mold organisms, then avoid using any product to which the organism is resistant.
Schnabel, as well as Natalia Perez, a University of Florida plant pathologist in Balm, will field test the kits with growers this spring.
"We tested them in the lab, and they worked great," he says.
Their work is part of a a four-year, $2.9 million U.S. Department of Agriculture grant project to develop a forecasting system for two strawberry fungal diseases.
Managing fungicide resistance is part of the research project
The fungal organism that causes gray mold in strawberries has become completely resistant to some fungicides that Southeastern growers have been relying upon for years.
Should spring weather be cool and wet, strawberry producers may experience the "perfect storm."
With that in mind, Guido Schnabel, a research and Extension plant pathologist at Clemson University, says growers should carefully choose and rotate fungicides.
His research group collected samples from
- four counties in North Carolina and from
- eight in South Carolina.
The fungicide classes with the greatest levels of resistance were QoIs, SDHIs and benzimidazoles, he says.
- QoI fungicides include strobilurins, fenamidone and famoxadone.
- SDHIs include fluopyram and boscalid.
- Benzimidazole include benomyl and thiabendazole.
But the resistance wasn't uniform, Schnabel says.
"In some areas, benzimidazoles are still active, while in other areas SDHIs are still active," he says.
What has him more concerned is how widespread the resistance is.
"We didn't expect to see that much resistance so widespread," he says.
The resistance is caused by mutation at the fungicidal target site in the fungi.
"The fitness of the resistant isolates compares to the sensitive isolates," Schnabel says. "Even though you back off with one chemical, there's a good chance that the resistant ones will outcompete the sensitive ones."
As a result, it may take several years of not using a fungicide before the fungal organism regains sensitivity to the product.
The fungus, Botrytis cinerea, causes crown rot, tissue blight and fruit rot.
During wet, cool weather, untreated plants can lose up to 90 percent of flowers and fruit.
Growers may be unaware of the resistance problem because they have not experienced total product failure, he says.
In addition, recent dry weather has minimized fungal pressures.
Growers may be spraying regularly, but the dry weather—and not the fungicide—is keeping gray mold in check, Schnbabel says.
To help growers determine whether they have resistant gray mold isolates in their fields and to which chemical or chemicals, Schnabel is part of a team developing field test kits.
These are similar to test kits he helped develop for Southeastern peach growers who had resistant fruit rot isolates in their orchards.
The idea is growers test the gray mold organisms, then avoid using any product to which the organism is resistant.
Schnabel, as well as Natalia Perez, a University of Florida plant pathologist in Balm, will field test the kits with growers this spring.
"We tested them in the lab, and they worked great," he says.
Their work is part of a a four-year, $2.9 million U.S. Department of Agriculture grant project to develop a forecasting system for two strawberry fungal diseases.
Managing fungicide resistance is part of the research project
Monday, January 23, 2012
Weather Review from UK Ag Weather Center
Compliments of Tom Priddy, UK Agricultural Weather Center:
Review of the year's Weather across Kentucky provided by NWS Weather Offices:
Take some time to check out their website, also. There's a wealth of weather-related information for growers across the region. http://wwwagwx.ca.uky.edu/
Friday, January 13, 2012
Disease-Resistant Apple Cultivars
Selecting the Best Apples for Backyard Orchards
Apples, the most popular of the pomme fruits, are a treat for gardeners and hobby orchardists. Although backyards do not have the immense disease pressure experienced in commercial orchards, a proactive disease-control program is still essential. Apple production requires a dedicated gardener and often a preventative spray schedule. An effective disease-management program can include 10 or more fungicide applications, and without some type of program, disease loss will be extremely high.
Some of the most destructive diseases affecting apple include fire blight, apple scab, cedar apple rust, and powdery mildew. Their prominence makes organic apple production in Kentucky extremely difficult. Thus, gardeners desiring low-pesticide fruit should begin with disease-resistant cultivars. Those included in the table below produce high-quality fruit and exhibit resistance to a variety of diseases. Incorporation of these and other cultivars can greatly reduce fungicide applications in the home orchard. However these cultivars have no resistance to the insects that find apples particularly enticing. Alternatively, bagging individual fruit when they are roughly an inch in diameter significantly reduces fungicide and insecticide spray requirements. http://www.ca.uky.edu/entomology/entfacts/ef218.asp
Additional information can be obtained by accessing publications ID-21 Disease and Insect Control Programs for Homegrown Fruit in Kentucky, ID-92 Midwest Fruit Tree Spray Guide, or other UK Plant Pathology Extension publications (http://www.ca.uky.edu/agcollege/plantpathology/extension/pubs.html) .
Additional information can be obtained by accessing publications ID-21 Disease and Insect Control Programs for Homegrown Fruit in Kentucky, ID-92 Midwest Fruit Tree Spray Guide, or other UK Plant Pathology Extension publications (http://www.ca.uky.edu/agcollege/plantpathology/extension/pubs.html) .
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Resistant Fire Blight in Apple
Strep-Resistant Fire Blight Found In New York
A strain of streptomycin-resistant fire blight has been detected in New York apple orchards.
January 10, 2012 from http://www.growingproduce.com/article/24655/strep-resistant-fire-blight-found-in-new-york
Cornell plant pathologists have issued a warning to New York apple and pear growers after discovering a strain of fire blight that is resistant to such traditional treatments as the antibiotic streptomycin.
For 50 years, the disease has been kept at bay using the antibiotic, but streptomycin-resistant strains of the disease were recently found in four locations in Wayne and Ontario counties.
“This is a serious situation that we need to manage effectively. The rapid identification of this outbreak positions us to implement a coordinated plan leading up to next year’s growing season,” said Herb Aldwinckle, professor of plant pathology and plant-microbe biology at Cornell’s New York State Agricultural Experiment Station (NYSAES) in Geneva.
In coordination with colleagues at NYSAES and Cornell Cooperative Extension, Aldwinckle is developing guidelines growers can follow to reduce the threat. Upcoming sessions at the Fruit and Vegetable Expo and CCE Fruit Schools in several counties will also provide growers with opportunities to learn more about the outbreak and possible solutions.
Fire blight is caused by the bacterium Erwinia amylovora, earning its name from the scorched appearance of infected leaves and branches. Its symptoms include blackening of flowers and young leaves, resulting in crop loss and even death of trees.
This current infection was first spotted in Wolcott, NY, where a persistent suspected fire blight infection evaded a streptomycin spray regime. Samples were immediately brought to Aldwinckle’s lab.
Sampling was necessarily limited in late fall, so the full extent of the outbreak will be unclear until additional samples are studied, but the latest results indicate there are several outbreaks of strep-resistant fire blight in Wayne and Ontario counties.
Aldwinckle said the fact that one of the sites is a nursery does complicate the management plan. Fortunately, that nursery has a strict rogueing program — in which infected plants are removed from the soil and destroyed — that should minimize the chance of spread, he added.
However, Aldwinckle noted that some infections might not be immediately visible, so there’s a possibility that a small number of trees with the strain were inadvertently shipped to growers.
He advises all growers to examine their trees carefully for any symptoms of fire blight that may develop after planting. These recommendations apply to all trees purchased, with particular attention for those from New York and Michigan nurseries, where strep-resistant fire blight is known to occur.
He is also exploring other ways to eradicate the blight.“The antibiotic kasugamycin is as effective as streptomycin, and in some ways it is a more appropriate antibiotic because it is not used in human or veterinary medicine,” said Aldwinckle. “Kerik Cox, an assistant professor of plant pathology at Cornell, is leading an application for a Section 18 emergency registration from the EPA for growers to use Kasumin [commercial kasugamycin] next spring.”
For 50 years, the disease has been kept at bay using the antibiotic, but streptomycin-resistant strains of the disease were recently found in four locations in Wayne and Ontario counties.
“This is a serious situation that we need to manage effectively. The rapid identification of this outbreak positions us to implement a coordinated plan leading up to next year’s growing season,” said Herb Aldwinckle, professor of plant pathology and plant-microbe biology at Cornell’s New York State Agricultural Experiment Station (NYSAES) in Geneva.
In coordination with colleagues at NYSAES and Cornell Cooperative Extension, Aldwinckle is developing guidelines growers can follow to reduce the threat. Upcoming sessions at the Fruit and Vegetable Expo and CCE Fruit Schools in several counties will also provide growers with opportunities to learn more about the outbreak and possible solutions.
Fire blight is caused by the bacterium Erwinia amylovora, earning its name from the scorched appearance of infected leaves and branches. Its symptoms include blackening of flowers and young leaves, resulting in crop loss and even death of trees.
This current infection was first spotted in Wolcott, NY, where a persistent suspected fire blight infection evaded a streptomycin spray regime. Samples were immediately brought to Aldwinckle’s lab.
Sampling was necessarily limited in late fall, so the full extent of the outbreak will be unclear until additional samples are studied, but the latest results indicate there are several outbreaks of strep-resistant fire blight in Wayne and Ontario counties.
Aldwinckle said the fact that one of the sites is a nursery does complicate the management plan. Fortunately, that nursery has a strict rogueing program — in which infected plants are removed from the soil and destroyed — that should minimize the chance of spread, he added.
However, Aldwinckle noted that some infections might not be immediately visible, so there’s a possibility that a small number of trees with the strain were inadvertently shipped to growers.
He advises all growers to examine their trees carefully for any symptoms of fire blight that may develop after planting. These recommendations apply to all trees purchased, with particular attention for those from New York and Michigan nurseries, where strep-resistant fire blight is known to occur.
He is also exploring other ways to eradicate the blight.“The antibiotic kasugamycin is as effective as streptomycin, and in some ways it is a more appropriate antibiotic because it is not used in human or veterinary medicine,” said Aldwinckle. “Kerik Cox, an assistant professor of plant pathology at Cornell, is leading an application for a Section 18 emergency registration from the EPA for growers to use Kasumin [commercial kasugamycin] next spring.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)